We could ask DKI to give us an API access to the semantic enrichment of our publications and show it in Kappa
Is this for handling a backlog, or for retrieving information about our publications from them on a continuous basis?
For the latter, my point of view is that Kappa v3 should be the canonical place for this information, and ONE Sight should get it from us not the other way around.
How this could be done is described here: https://pacps01.oecd.org/redmine/issues/10983
While this only talks about Multilingual Summaries, it could easily be extended to all publication types that make sense. All the information how to use the API can be found in the attached document that DKI provided.
I understand this point much better after today's meeting. I did not understand why we would have to redo some of the work which was already done instead of retrieving it as is. I will write some minutes from today and support your idea of Kappa interacting with Temis instead of Pascale's view of retrieving what they already do.
Then we need to see if this work is Basheerable because if it is so, then it could be started very soon when he comes back from holidays maybe
You won't be notified about changes to this idea.